Writing About Literature

In the stories The salientian Prince by Gustaf Tenggren and Hazel Tells LaVerne by Katharyn Machan are both very similar stories with relation to a toad. The unity thing that seems to jump out to the reader is that one boloney takes push through in a totally different time period than the other. devil comparisons that will be made in my apologue will be the main focus on the frog character and how time is such a big setting or difference from one story to the other.The metrical composition version of this frog prince hazel Tells LaVerne is told in past distort meaning the story had taken place the night before and the bank clerk is telling the story by what had happened while she was at work. As I read this story I quickly realized this had to have taken place in our present day and time because of the description told in the story about her cleaning of a toilet. Obviously the narrator sounded as if she wasnt very much educated at all from the sounds of her talking.Howeve r, the former was very clever because she sounds as if she is trying to continue the actual story of The Frog Prince to a now modern day story of what would most(prenominal) likely occur immediately. In the actual fairy tale The Frog Prince details get very specific for this story is the actual and authorized story of The Frog Prince. The golden egg is key mentionable item in this story because its also mentioned in the poemHazel Tells Laverne. Princess made a promise with a frog she came across in a wellhead which was if the frog had gotten her ball she would bring the frog back to her palace, feed him, and repose with him.She eventually broke her promises thinking because she had her ball after the frog retrieved it she didnt have to follow up on the promise she made. The frog went to the castle told the king for he knew a vocalize is someones word so she must follow through forcing her to do so. Princess got sick of it threw the frog into a wall but not least and a piec e occurred and she turned into a frog and he a prince. The golden ball was mentioned in both stories which was why I assumed that perhaps the poem was a continuation of the original fairy tale.Both stories had a frog prince which is why I will also conclude that maybe Katharyn Machan wrote the poem she did to defy a shorter, more of modern day story of The Frog Prince, and maybe she wants to make a statement by how oblivious our society is today as to what it was hundreds of years ago. Both were very interesting stories in that they both had a different meaning and served a different purpose for not only the author but for the reader. It depends on how you perceive the message in the stories and this is how the story was presented to me which answers why I wrote what I did for my comparison between the ii stories.