A meta-analytical review of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leaders’ constructive conflict management Essay

Conflict workmanlike leadingIntroduction The hold examines the connection involving emotional intelligence and the mogul of leaders to manage and resolve conflict positively. According to Schlaerth, Ensari, & Christian, (2013) understanding of rough-and-ready conflict commission is important characteristics for competent leaders that lead to shaping conflict management in organizations. Competent leaders are suitable to solve conflict in an organization due to their emotional intelligence. The trait helps leaders to understand their own emotions and those of other workers. The number is use of the around effective conflict resolution process and strategy that would ensure the achievement of the organization. Lack of ability to resolve conflicts inferentially affects the relationship between the employees and the leadership. The result is poor performance in an organization, which is blamed on poor leadership. Therefore, the bind acknowledges the roles of leade rs in the conflict resolution. In addition, it evidences the importance of extraordinary ability to handle emotions in order to achieve constructive conflict resolution. Consequently, the article discusses the need of emotional intelligence for the non-leader workers in order to ensure constructive conflict resolution. The non-leader workers will help to reinforce strategies and process that are move down by leaders to resolve the conflict constructively. Hence, the article tries to forebode the question about what of competent leaders in conflict management and resolutions. In addition, it points out the involvement of other workers in connection with leaders in order to achieve effective and constructive conflict solution. informantSchlaerth, A., Ensari, N., & Christian, J. (2013). A meta-analytical review of the relationship between emotional intelligence and leaders constructive conflict management.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations,16(1), 126-136.Source document