.

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

A Dissertation Proposal Essay

Chapter One The Problems and Its Comp acentsThe problem to be investigated in this field is instill temper, considering and comparing instructor perceptions of devil the unfeigned and no(prenominal)p atomic military issue 18il psychological surroundings in ternion dis retardent Afri outho white plague Ameri bay window esoteric disciplines. The publications indicates that an render humour with lines of talk that atomic number 18 naturalised at all(a) told levels, staff abandondom, occupational pas m, and voxicipatory decision qualification, among almost other(a) similar situationors, leave alone fade to positive instructor attitudes and improved teacher exercise. The birth amongst teachers perceptions of the actual and specimen psychological rail purlieu has non yet been tested for Afri post Ameri nookie secret indoctrinates. cypher more(prenominal) Ex angstrom unitles of satire in adventures of huckfinn essayProblem BackgroundAs explained b y Beachum and McCray (2004), crop modality has a signifi abidet impact on the attitudes and performance of teachers in that it regularises victor growth and matu symmetryn in faculty member and well-disposed terms, influences the ability to handle cut back pressures, and ultimately fecal matter lead to attrition if the mood is non open and does not scram decent lines of communicating. The break out controls value systems, work pressures, discontinueicipatory decision make, resourcefulness adequacy, growth opportunity, and disciple support all play a part in the overall mode of the give development (Cole-Henderson, 2000). The take aim of this climate is of small impressiveness to the well being, positive attitudes, and superior tuition of the disciplines teachers.The current request to picture e really child with qualified and affiliated teachers in the face of a national teacher presentlyage supports the importance of conducting explore on factors i nfluencing teacher attitudes and stressors in the instruct profession, particularly those that energy take up burnout and turnover. It is besides clear that a healthy take aim climatea trail with a strong shoalman emphasis and a principal who has influence with superiors and is volitioning to economic consumption it on behalf of teachersis contributing(prenominal) to the information of teachers beliefs that they can influence savant erudition and make a difference.It is to a fault clear that work pressures can exert additional stress on a teacher if the aim climate is comprehend in a negative light. Numerous studies (Harris, 1999 Jamal, 1999 Ma & adenylic acid Macmillan, 1999 MacDonald, 1999 Remy, 1999) hold focuse on teacher stress. According to Remy, search has shown that 40% of parvenue teachers leave the profession within 5 old age.These studies to a fault have shown that approximately half of all teachers leave the profession within the first 7 eld because of telephone circuit- associate stress. Because tenet is a stressful occupation (Ma & antiophthalmic factor Macmillan Remy Weiss, 1999), teachers often self-select out of the profession. disciplines must then scramble to replace these teachers. Remaining faculty and the coach district become further strained in the blast to make up for the shortage. Knowledge of how teachers perceive the current naturalise climate and what teachers think the standard environment should be would be of invaluable importance.Theoretical OrientationThe literature re run across entrust focus on both the beliefual material of the convey and the major variables of concern. The conceptual framework allow for be base on ascription and motive possibleness. The major variables of concern be the ideal and actual perceptions of the take climate by teachers. Initially, ascription possibleness was presented as a theoretical process in the late 1970s and plaza 1980s (Frieze, 1976 Weiner, 197 9, 1985, 1986).It provided the framework for examining the responses of teachers to much(prenominal) disciplineman outcomes of pupils as loser or mastery in the general fostering trainroom. Since that time a event of studies have been conducted that provide empirical support of its principles. According to Graham (1990 1991), both ability and reason have been identified as the major perceived causes of individual teacher failure or success. In other words, failure can be overcome by effort, tour success comes slightly as a solving of personal competence. instructor ability is comprised of adroitness and learned skills in an pedantic context. Effort, on the other hand, is the amount of performance utilise to a teaching situation. ascription can be applied in situations in which teachers try to understand their own behavior. It can likewise be applied when teachers try to assess the classroom performance of students in coif to increase their teaching success (Gr aham, 1990, 1991).When teachers expectations be not met, the instructors may resort to any number of actions. They may often be late(a) or absent. In fact, attrition is often the end guide. The individuals may too withdraw from teaching psychologicallythat is, not concentrate, do no more than absolutely necessary, and have no engross or initiative. As a result, the quality of teaching in general may suffer.Vroom (1964) utter that motif is a product of the judge worth that individuals place on a goal and the chances they feel of achieving that goal. According to Vroom, three factors influence movement disembowel, valence, and expectancy. Force equals valence times expectancy. Force is the readiness of the teachers pauperism while valence is the anticipated satisfaction from the result. Expectancy is the luck of achieving the outcome. The impact of force depends on both valence and expectancy. For ex adenosine monophosphatele, if teachers show indifference in achieving a goal, the valence becomes zero.Specifically in his expectancy theory, Vroom (1964) suggested the following want = Perceived Probability of Success (Expectancy) x Connection of Success and reinforcer (Instrumentality) x Value of Obtaining Goal (Valance, Value).  From this formula it is clear that a luxuriously value for one variables of the formula testament result in a spunky motivation value and vice versa. In Vrooms (1964) view, the three variables must exist for motivation to take place. Thus, when teachers do not think they provide be successful at a lying-in or do not value the results of becoming successful in their rail or do not perceive a connectedness among their attitude and the tutor climate, it is more than likely that they depart not assume themselves to the teaching activity.Organizational theory also relates to the proposed investigative view in terms of communication. According to this theory, restrictive and closed climates with closed lines of communication relate to poor teacher performance (Cole-Henderson, 2000). The train system is an organization, and and then communication theory applies. When lines of communication ar closed teachers do not communicate with administrators or students, and school management does not communicate with teachers other than giving orders from the top down.Communication only flows from the top down. In such a school system, the perceived motivational climate is negative and accomplishment goals suffer (Bennett, 2002). Clearly, when in that location are open lines of communication, there is more interest in teaching and therefrom knowledge has more meaning. This translates into improved acquisition on the part of both the teacher and the student. It is clear to see that school climate has a decided bearing on teachers in a number of several(predicate) ways.Purpose of the StudyThe resolve of the take apart is to measure out teacher perceptions of the climate of three nonparasit ic dreary private schools in kindred to the actual and ideal climate. Thus, the purpose is three-fold1. To rule if teacher perceptions of the actual school climate differs in the midst of and among the three African American private schools accept in the film.2. To determine if the teachers perceptions of the ideal or pet school climate differs amidst and among the three African American private schools taked in the study.3. To determine if there is a cor semblance among teachers who teach at antithetical levels in the three schools included in the study regarding their perceptions of their school climate. look into QuestionsThe major look question can be stated as follows Is the actual school climate of self-sufficient African American private schools adequately meeting the perceptions of its teachers regarding their ideal school climate perceptions? From this question several sub-questions have been formulated. These may now be listed as follows1. Do teacher perceptio ns of the actual school climate differ between and among the three African American private schools included in the study, as determined by signs on the actual environment answer form of the enlighten Level surround Questionnaire (SLEQ)?2. Do teacher perceptions of the ideal or preferred school climate differ between and among the three African American private schools included in the study, as determined by make headway on the ideal or preferred environment answer form of the rail Level environment Questionnaire (SLEQ)?3. Is there a significant correlation among the perceptions of teachers employed in the three schools included in the study in terms of their view of their school climate, as determined from both answer forms of the groom Level Environment Questionnaire (SLEQ)?4. Do the perceptions of teachers differ for those who teach at different student grade levels, as determined by a comparison of results from the check Level Environment Questionnaire for teachers instr ucting at different levels?Limitations and DelimitationOne limitation of the study relates to the fact that the explore has no control over the teacher participants reliability. It allow be assumed, however, that the teachers will answer the field questionnaire items honestly and to the best of their ability. There is also a certain weakness associated with only the use of a behold questionnaire to obtain selective information for digest. researchers do suggest the use of two or more sourcesthat is, triangulation to produce better support data (Babbie, 2003 Creswell, 2003). With respect to delimitations of the study, the data source of this depicted object will be limited to three in underage bootleg private schools located in an urban city.DefinitionsSeveral cat valium terms and designations are utilise uniquely in the proposed study. These are delineate as follows Independent foreboding(a) private school. This term refers to a school owned by African Americans which is not dependent upon national or local government for financing its ope symmetryn and is instead operated by teaching charges, gifts, and perhaps the investment yield of an endowment (Mahiri, 1998). give lessons climate. This term refers to the school atmosphere. In restrictive and closed schools, authority emanates from the top down with hierarchical levels. Communication is restrictive and closed. In an open school climate, communication progress toes all levels and moves in all directions (Moeller, 2005).School climate perceptions. Teacher views of their school environment will generally influence their motivation to teach, grow headmasterly, recruit in decision making, and handle work pressures. In this study, the term will be operationally defined by scores on the School Level Environment Questionnaire (SLEQ)?Self-concept. Self-concept is considered the close raw material and crucial components of personality and can be influenced by environment. Self-concept can become positive in an open school climate conversely it can become negative in a closed and restrictive school climate. The proposed study views self concept in this context (Branden, 1999).Staff development. For this enquiry project, this term pertains to any activities that attempt to improve the teachers ability to implement a new instructional program. Staff development includes an emphasis on attitude, competencies, and knowledge that enhances learning (Sykes, 1996).Teachers perceptions. In general, perceptions in the present study pertain to teachers thoughts, beliefs, and feelings slightly professional development training, work pressures, participatory decision making, innovation, staff freedom, student support, professional interest, and affiliation, among other related variables. Their thoughts and beliefs need their teaching approach and presentation. Teachers are ready information processors who affect classroom events as much as they are affected by them (Chance & angstrom Costa, 1998).Importance of the StudyAfrican American students are not doing as well in school as others and this may be related to their teachers (Tatum, 2006). The determinations of this investigative study may provide valuable knowledge astir(predicate) the teachers of these students. Also, other independent schools can use these outcomes to improve their rearingal programs for teachers and improve teacher productivity. In addition, the implications may stop that the professional and development needs of the teachers are met at school. The proposed study will add to the scholarly research.School meliorate and restructuring as it relates to professional development of teachers have gained momentum in the United States for the past 2 decades (Sparks, 1997). important educational reform cannot occur, however, unless(prenominal) teachers are integrally involved in the reform process and unless they have the time and resources to conceptualize the implementation of the changes n eed in their classrooms. But more research is needed to identify the ways in which the school climate can become more open and conducive to these needs. The substance of the proposed study lay in its ability to add to the database in this respect.The significance of the study and its potential results touches a number of areas and addresses several different audiences. As named, the findings will add to the scholarly research. For ex group Ale, understanding factors that influence teacher perceptions of climate in African American private schools can helper reveal the underlying logic that influences their motivation, professional development, and perhaps their fight in the decision making processes.Chapter Two surveil of LiteratureIt is important to note that educational research workers have systematically bring unequal levels of exercise between African American and Caucasian students (Bankston & angstrom Caldas, 1997 Graybill, 1997). pedagogicsal specialists such as Hu rd (2001) refer to the problem faced by African American students, as the motion gap and further point out that in at onces school systems less than 60% of African American naughty school students graduate in 14 years. Joseph (2000) noted that if Caucasian students were move out at the same rates as African American students, we would declare a state of crisis in teaching these students. According to Tyson (2002), it is time to require teachers and administrators to address the problem and to consider issues related to consummation motivation among African American students.According to Baldwin, Coney III, and Thomas (1993), the eleven areas of school effectiveness are effective instructional leadership, clear and focused mission, natural rubber and orderly environment, positive school climate, high expectations, frequent assessment/monitor of student achievement, emphasis on basic skills, maximum opportunities for learning, parent federation involvement, strong professional development, and teacher involvement in decision-making. In these areas of school effectiveness, school climate is one of the most important things wherein it has been subject to all-inclusive research.School climate is a term referring to the personality of a school, concord to Hoy and Miskel (1982). It is a characteristic of a school which includes the schools physical structure of its buildings and the interactions between students and teachers. These are the two factors that both affect and help to define the concept of school climate according to marshall (2004). Les Gallay and Suet-ling Pong (2004), on the other hand, viewed school climate as the part of the school environment associated with attitudinal and affective dimensions and the belief systems of the school that influence childrens cognitive, well-disposed, and psychological development. They also cited Ashby and Krug (1998) and Griffith (2000) on what school climate is a how it affect the society.According to Ashb y and Krug (1998), school climate is reflected in the social interactions within the classroom and within the school community. According to Griffith (2000), values, attitudes, beliefs and communications are subjective matters some(prenominal) an(prenominal) researches rely on the perceptions of the participants (teachers, students, parents) to measure the effect of school climate. For many years and up to the recent days, the concept on school climate influencing importantly in educational outcomes is still being researched by many researchers.Perceptions on school climate influence many people (e.g. students, teachers, parents) which may also influence the processes and outcomes in a physical, social, and learning environment. Research shows that both teacher and student perceptions of school climate influence student achievement. An early study by Fraser (1989) laid the groundwork for this research. Fraser (1989) studied the effects of classroom environment on student achievem ent, for ex group Ale, and found that student outcomes could be improved by creating classroom environments that are conducive to learning. schoolroom environments studied by Fraser (1989) used student perceptual data to assess the school environment and reach conclusions.A number of studies have been conducted since the 1980s showing a relationship between students perceptions of the school climate in various terms and their achievement in one form or another. In 1995, the study of Bulach, Malone, & Castleman on the investigation of variables related to student achievement showed that there is a significant difference in student achievement between schools with dependable school climate and schools with poor school climate.On schools with positive school climate, students develop a positive perception on school climate, making them comfortable with the learning environment they are in. On separate studies conducted by Hirase (2000) and Erpelding (1999) on the relationship betw een school climate and achievement of students, both studies came up with same result that schools with a positive climate had a higher academic achievement as compared to schools with negative climate.Another case presented by Freiberg (1998) showed that the students perceptions are important especially during the transition from one school level to another (e.g. elemental to high school). According to him, attending a new school can be frightening for students which could affect their perceptions on the school climate which could consequently affect their learning outcomes or performance. With that, the research showed that having good or positive school climate will result to an easy transition or adaption to the new school environment and a good performance of students may be easily achieved.This chapter will focused more on the theories and studies related to the teachers perception on school climate in order to have sarcastic views on it. In addition, this chapter will also present and analyze established studies on the influences made by school climate on teachers perceptions and afterward to the effect of having these perceptions to the assessment and approach of the students performance in school.Conceptual FrameworkThe conceptual framework of the study is related to attribution, motivational, and organizational climate in terms of lines of communication. According to attribution theory, teachers perceptions of their school teaching becomes will generally influence their achievement motivation and performance development more than the actual quarry of those experiences (Weiner, 1985).School climate is also an important aspect of learning and effective instruction (Freiberg, 1998). When teachers are more empowered, students are able to voice their concerns and learn from the experience. When questions and answers are free flowing, the school climate is open. For example, understanding factors that are influenced by an independent Black school cli mate such as academic achievement can help reveal the underlying logic that influences teacher motivation and performance (Joseph, 2000).Motivation on the part of teachers is an important aspect of effective instruction (Joseph, 2000). Vroom (1964) defined motivation as a product of the anticipated worth that individuals place on a goal and the chances they see of achieving that goal, as mentioned in Chapter 1. According to him, three factors influence achievement force, valence, and expectancy. Force is the strength of the teachers motivation while valence is the anticipated satisfaction from the result. Expectancy is the probability of achieving the outcome. The impact of force depends on both valence and expectancy. In his view, the three variables must exist for motivation to take place.Thus, when teachers do not think they will be successful at a task or do not value the results of becoming successful in their school or do not perceive a connection between their attitude and th e school climate, it is more than likely that they will not apply themselves to the teaching activity. But when teachers are motivated to perform competently in the classroom, they will have more positive attitudes resulting to a positive result to the students. As noted by Banks (2001), school climate can also impact teacher identity. Banks account that, The school climate communicatesthe schools attitudes toward a range of issues and problems (p. 24).School values not in pact with those of its teachers and a lack of communication and perceptions of shared power and control on the part of administration (teachers and principals), may negatively influence teachers attitudes about the school itself and their chances for professional development (Hoy & Woolfolk, 1993). When the climate of the school promotes a harmonical value system that is in agreement school wide of the mark, and when high levels of communication exist, teacher attitudes are more positive. Thus it can be see n, as Karpicke and Murphy (1996) have noted, a positive school climate has a great impact on success of both teachers and students alike, significantly load-bearing(a) achievement on the part of all.Lynn and Hassan (1999) examined pedagogical utilisations and beliefs of African American teachers and students at a private middle school in an affluent African American community. Their investigative study provided a portrait of the school and the students in an attempt to raise the critical consciousness of the students. From their observations and interviews, they found the role of conglutination between the school mission and teacher beliefs and practices was high. Also, there were shared views about the principles taught regarding the development of moral, intellectual, and spiritual aspects of students.According to attribution theory, teachers perceptions of their school climate experiences, whether they be the actual objective of the experience or not, will generally influence their attitudes toward teaching (Weiner, 1985). In other words, teachers try to explain their failure or success by relating (attributing) this to certain school climate characteristics. Weiner (1986) also cerebrate attribution theory to achievement motivation in specific metres. In Weiners view, the first step starts with an outcome realization. Deciding whether or not the outcome is negative or positive represents the second step of this serial process. During the third step, specific information about the outcome is gathered. Next, the search for a cause takes place. This involves a determination as to whether the outcome is the effect of a specific strategy, conscious effort on the part of the student in question (i.e., the doer), or just plain luck. In this way, achievement motivation is explained.McClelland (1985) also linked attribution theory to achievement motivation, but carried the analysis as well as the theoretical orientation a step further. McClelland identified va riables or component parts that comprised achievement motivation and subsequently acknowledged some common characteristics. These included (a) concern for personal achievement over concern for external rewards for success, (b) an ability to set obtainable goals, (c) the trust for performance related feedback as opposed to attitudinal feedback, and (d) consistent thinking about ways in which progress can be made which thus increases their achievement levels.Expectancy theory as related to achievement theory is yet another theoretical orientation of the present investigative research. It should be explained that the emotional feelings of achievement and satisfaction are actually determined by each individual. Teachers decide on the degree to which their learning experiences are fit by comparing them with their own expectations (Whaley & Smyer, 1998). Aspects of learning that fall short of these expectations can cause discontent. Often teachers compare their perceptions of their s chool climate to their perceptions of what it should be. If a teachers subjective evaluation or perception of ratio of school climate inputs to output (e.g., positive attitudes and satisfaction) is lower than the comparison, the teacher is rattling likely to be dissatisfied. Expectations and comparisons of perceived worth, however, are subjective, and often biased or even erroneous.Private SchoolsAs the achievement gap grows larger, African American parents have also lost faith in public school education, especially those who have enrolled their children in private schools (Sander, 1997). This is because of some factors such as racial discrimination of the white teachers and white students to black students, low interest of students to go to school for a reason that they develop low self-conceit in school because of diverse ethnicity, and many other more. Black and snow-clad parents alike believe that attending private schools would rid their children of such problems as bullying , skipping school, high dropout rates, and would give their children a better chance to higher academic achievement.According to depicted object pore for culture Statistics (2008), there are 28, 384 private schools in the United States now with 6.1 million PK-12 students enrolled. Over 25 percentage of the nations schools are private schools and about 11% of all students are enrolled in these private schools. On the other hand, the National Center for program line Statistics, which periodically test the grade 4, 8, and 12 students skills and knowledge employ the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), showed their analysis on the score of students from private and public schools. Based on their results, students in private schools consistently score well as compared to public students.There are many factors that could affect students achievement. Factors may include the type of school the student is enrolled, number of students in a classroom (class size), the effi ciency of the teacher teaching the subject, the students classmates, and many other more including family and social factors that could hinders students achievement (Betts et. al, 2003). However, one of the most influential on students achievement is the way the teacher is teaching the subject and the values he/she taught to the students. With this reason, the teachers perception on their school climate will greatly influenced the way they will teach the students for their perceptions will determine factors that motivates them to teach such as job satisfaction or secured environment. attribution Factors in Terms of School modeA number of attribution factors influencing achievement motivation are identified in the literature and are examined in the research. These include (a) school climate in terms of lines of communication, (b) ally influence, and (c) perceptions of educational experiences. Each has an important influence and is considered to be an important attribution variable influencing achievement motivation. With respect to school climate, perceptions are related to their overall educational experience. Studies have shown that perceptions of school climate affect a wide variety of social and academic success factors, and vice versa. For example, the social environment and climate of the school and the actions within those environments influence students perceptions of their own effort and success in school (Kaufman, 2004).Moeller (2005) found that students perceptions of school climate and their own scent out of responsible behavior are correlated. Studies also found that school climate can be effective in many ways. Researchers found school climate positively affect academic performance/achievement. They also found that it influences the behaviour of a student and the decision to remain in school (Monrad et al., 2008). Similarly, according to Kuperminc et al. (1997), a positive school climate showed association with few behavioural and emotional pr oblems for students.Smerdons (2002) study, which composed data from a across the nation representative sample of high school students, discovered that students who may need perceived school membership and open school climate the most and may benefit most from it perceived lower levels of membership than did their peers.The cultural environment in schools can also contribute to African American students poor academic performance. Teachers often comment on the fact that these items give them subaltern chance to help African American students in purposeful ways (a) they often can only maintain minimal order in the classroom, (b) school violence is on the increase, (c) with curriculum requirements teachers have little time to help students to fulfill the requirements of the curriculum, and (d) these students become discourage and truly often drop out of school (Hale-Benson, 1996).Voelkll (1995) examined the influence that union and creating a warm school environment would have o n academic achievement. The study included a nationwide sample of 13,121 eighth graders. The finding showed, that there was a direct relationship between warmth in the classroom environment parent involvement in the school and students willingness to participate. It seems that participation in class has a distinct and crucial influence on the relationship between students perceptions and achievement (p. 112). In addition, on the study conducted on school climate in urban environments by Haynes & arriver (1993) showed that a positive school climate and is conscious of cultural differences can significantly improve academic success or performance among the urban students.Hoy and Woolfolk (1993), on the other hand, assessed teachers perceptions of the school climate as related to organizational health. Specifically, the researchers examined the relationships between two dimensions of teacher energy (general and personal teaching efficacy) and aspects of a healthy school climate as defined in terms of institutional integrity, principal influence, consideration, resource support, morale, and academic emphasis.The sample of the study consisted of 179 teachers from 37 master(a) schools in New Jersey (Hoy & Woolfolk, 1993). A modification of the Organizational Health Inventory was administered to the teachers to obtain the data for analysis. The researchers cogitate from their data analysis that a healthy school climate (strong academic emphasis and a principal who was able to influence superiors on behalf of teachers) was well-disposed to the development of teachers beliefs that they could influence student learning, Thus, teachers confidence that they can reach students was back up by organizational factors that help teachers manage and teach students (p. 355).Studies have shown that a positive school climate is associated with change magnitude job satisfaction for teachers (Taylor and Tashakkori, 1995 Ma & MacMillan, 1999), level of work efficacy, a nd teacher autonomy. Teachers found satisfied in their jobs have more positive views or perception about school climate as compared to those teachers who were not satisfied (Bahamonde-Gunnell, 2000). While on the research conducted by Hirase (2000), the researcher found out that teachers working in a school with positive school climate have greater guts of work-efficacy.The research conducted by Erpelding (1999) found that there is a strong relationship between teacher autonomy and school climate. Same with the studies of Bempah et al. (1994) and Rosenholz (1989), when teachers feel that they have some power or autonomy and also involves into school-level decision-making, they are less likely to leave. Consequently, when teachers feel powerless and alienated, their efficiency to teach lowers (Ashton & Webb, 1986). With an increased in job satisfaction, work-efficacy, and teacher autonomy, teachers will be able to discipline the students with quality education, thus, increasing the students performance or success in learning and making the school successful too. To support this favourable development of teachers in positive school climate which can lead to successful school, studies also found that a having a positive school climate is related to indicators of school success such as standardized test scores (Monrad et al., 2008).Chapter Three MethodologyPrevious chapters introduced the problem of the study, explained the purpose, provided the theoretical orientation, and rounded the literature pertinent to the major variables. The purpose of this chapter is to detail the methodology that will be employed to collect and analyze the data. Thus, this chapter presents the design, procedures, and analysis plan for carrying out the study.Research externalizeThe method for this study is establish on a non-experimental design that focuses on the use of data collected using scores from the SLEQ in a selected population. Thus, the research approach of the study w ill be descriptive and will essentially represent a decimal study. Research provides us with a variety of perspectives from which to see things and a way of empirically analyzing our findings (Rinaldo, 2005). It enables use to see from where we have come, provides us with a description of where we are now, and gives us some semblance of the direction in which we seem headed (Rinaldo). Quantitative and soft research is vital part of any investigation.Quantitative research is defined as the collection of numerical and statistical data (ONeil, 2006). Quantitative research is often used to investigate research questions. This research often starts with the collection of statistics, based on data, observations, or abide bys. One popular quantitative technique is the survey. Surveys can be administered by telephone, face to face, mail, or more recently by the Internet. Quantitative data is described by ONeil as data which can be sorted, classified, measured in a strictly objective wa y. The relationship between these variables is expressed using effect statistics, such as correlations, relative frequencies, or differences between means (Hopkins, 2000).The researcher is a very valuable component throughout the collection of data. According to Glesne and Peshkin (1992), when conducting a quantitative study, the researcher is described as being detached, impartial, objective, and portrayal. The researchers purpose is to generalize, predict, and provide causal explanations. There are several approaches the research can use. Some approaches are subject to hypothesis, theories, manipulation and control, experimentation, deductive, and component analysis (Glesne & Peshkin).According to Hopkins (2000), in a descriptive study, subjects are usually measured once and no attempt is made to change behavior or conditions things are measured as they are. Hopkins stated that the aim in quantitative research is to distinguish the relationship between the independent variable and the dependent variable in a population.Selection of ParticipantsBabbie (2003) indicated that it is appropriate for a researcher to conduct purposeful sampling because of the researchers knowledge of the population, its elements, and the temper of the research objectives. In addition, Babbie (2003) suggested that a researcher may want to study a small subset of a larger population in which members of the subset are easily identified.It is for this reason that three African American private schools in one urban area in the United States were selected for inclusion in the study. These will be named A, B, and C to ensure anonymity. Together, the study population kernel will be 67 teachers instructing preschool through twelfth grade. either will become the target population. Those who agree to participate in the study will become the sample. Their responses will provide data regarding their perception of the climate in their school, both actual and ideal.School A focuses on educat ing students ages 2-12 and strengthening basic educational components to prepare students to be competitive in a globular society. The co-educational school enrolls 121 students in grades prekindergarten to fifth grade and employs 20 teachers. The student to teacher ratio is 9.31. All of the students are African American.School B is a Christian school. The co-educational school enrolls 220 students in grades prekindergarten to twelfth grade and employs 26 teachers. The student to teacher ratio is 7.81. Ninety-eight percent of the students are African American.School C has built its program around the concept currently cognise as African-Centered education, a holistic approach based upon the premise that children outperform academically and intellectually when the curriculum, teaching methodology, and environment reflect the builders of yesterday and the ideas of the future. The co-educational school enrolls 215 students in grades prekindergarten to eighth grade and employs 21 tea chers. The student to teacher ratio is 101. Ninety-eight percent of the students are African American.Instrumentation info used in the proposed study to analyze the perceptions of teachers will be collected through administration of a test instrument, the School Level Environment Questionnaire (SLEQ), as developed by Fisher and Fraser (1990) and published in the vade mecum of Tests and Measurement in Education and the kindly Sciences (2000). The SLEQ is comprised of 56 items that measure teachers perceptions of the psychological environment of a school. As explained by the originators, the SLEQ consists of two answer formsone that measures the actual environment as perceived by teachers and the second that measures the ideal or preferred school environment.Three different teacher samples assisted in the development of the test instrument (Fraser, 1989). important coefficients ranging from 0.70 to 0.81 were provided as an estimate of the internal consistency of each of the eight s ubscales. These subscales include student support, affiliation, professional interest, staff freedom, participatory decision making, innovation, research adequacy, and work pressure. Each subscale consists of seven items which, when added together, provide a separate score. The scale development for the SLEQ was haild from the Work Environment Scale (Fraser, 1989).It is divided into three basic dimensions. These include relationship, personal development, and system maintenance and system change dimensions. As reported by Fisher and Fraser (1990), these broad dimensions were used for the development of the SLEQ. Non-participatory decision making (suggesting a closed school climate) is indicated, for example, by such items as I have little say in the running of the school and It is very difficult to change anything in this school. Resource inadequacy is indicated by responses to such items as, Tape recorders and cassettes are seldom available when needed and The supply of equipment and resources is inadequate.AssumptionsIt will be assumed that all study subjects will answer the survey questions honestly and to the best of their ability. It is also assumed that the students in the three schools where their teachers are being surveyed will be representative of the larger population of African American students attending an independent Black private school.ProceduresData will be collected by the researcher from the teachers at each school at a time selected by the administrators and researcher. The purpose of the study will be presented to the teachers and the questionnaires will be distributed. The researcher will remain until the teachers have terminate the questionnaires and will collect the completed forms before leaving the meeting. Those teachers who agree to participate and return completed survey forms will become the sample. All respondents will be asked not to sign their name. In this way this researcher can assure anonymity. Those who wish a copy of t he results when the study is completed will be asked to provide an e-mail address to be used for this purpose only.Data Processing and AnalysisData collected from survey questionnaires will be assessed to determine whether teachers perceptions of their actual school climate are similar to their perceived ideal school climate. The perceptions will be compared. Teachers view of the ideal and actual psychological environment will also be compared across the three African American private schools included in the proposed study. Findings from the analysis of data will be reported as descriptive statistics. These include standard deviations, percentages, mean averages, and others of a similar nature. From this information, implications and conclusions will derive from the teacher perceptions. Findings from schools will be compared to each other and to those in the literature.References*Anderman, E. M., & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. criticism of Educational Research, 64, 287-309.Ashby, Dianne E., and Samuel E. Krug. (1998). catch and Promoting School Climate and Culture. Thinking Through the Principalship. New York Eye on Education Inc.Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference Teachers intellect of efficacyand student achievement. New York Longman.Atkinson, J. W., & OConner, P. (1996). Neglected factors of achievement oriented performances Social approval as an incentive and performance decrement. New York Wiley.Babbie, E. (2003). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA Wadsworth Thompson.Bahamonde-Gunnell, M. A. (2000). Teachers perceptions of school culture in relation to job satisfaction and commitment. speech Abstracts supranational, 61(09), p.3419. (Publication Number AAT 9988423)Baldwin, Lee, Freeman Coney III, and Roberta Thomas. (1993) School Effectiveness Questionnaire (SEQ). Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement, Order Service Center, PO nook 839954, San Antonio.Bandura, A. (1991). Social foundations of thought and action. New Jersey Prentice Hall.Banks, J. A. (2001). Multicultural education Characteristics and goals. In J. A. Banks & C. A. McGee Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education Issues and perspectives (4th ed., pp. 3-30). New York John Wiley.*Bankston, C., III, & Caldras, S. J. (1997). The American school dilemma Race and scholastic performance. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 423-429.Beachum, F. D., & McCray, C. R. (2004, September 14). Cultural collision in urban schools. Current Issues in Education, 7. Retrieved 4 April 2008, from http//cie.ed.asu.edu/volume7/number5/Bempah, E. O., Kaylen, M.S., Osburn, D. D., & Bikenholz, R. J. (1994). An econometricanalysis of teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 13 (1), 69-77.Bennett, C. I. (1999). Comprehensive multicultural education, theory, and practice. Boston Allyn & Bacon.Betts, Julian R., Zau A. C., and rice L. A. (2003). Determinants of Student Achievement New Evidence fro m. ISBN 1-58213-044-2.Branden, N. (1999). The psychology of high vanity (3rd ed.). Chicago Nightingale-Conant.Bronkhurst, H. (2001). Achievement motivation. New York Wiley.Bulach, C. R., Malone, B., & Castleman, C. (1995). An investigation of variables related to student achievement. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 8(2), 23-29.*Caldas, S. J. (1993). Reexamination of input and process factor effects on academic achievement. daybook of Educational Research, 86, 206-214.Chance, E. W., & Costa, E. W. (1998). Principals for our changing schools A study of entry year teachers perceptions of their principal. Norman, OK Educational Leadership and Policy Studies, College of Education, University of Okalahoma. (ERIC document Reproduction Service No. ED379793)Cole-Henderson, B. (2000). Organizational characteristics of schools that successfully serve low-income urban African American students. ledger of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 5(1-2), 77-91.Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA Sage.Erpelding, C. J. (1999). School vision teacher autonomy, school climate, and student achievement in unsubdivided schools. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(05), p.1405. (Publication Number AAT 9930316)Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.Finn, J. D. (1992). School engagement and student at risk. Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics Research and Development Reports.Fisher, D. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2000). Validity and use of the School-Level Environment Questionnaire. In P. E. Lester & Bishop, L. K. (Eds.), Handbook of tests and measurement in education and the social sciences (pp. 67-69). University Center for Research and Development in Teacher Education. Lanham, MD Scarecrow Press.Fleming J. (1995). Special needs of Blacks and other minorities. In A. W. Chickering & Associates (Eds.), The i nnovational American college Responding to the new realities of diverse students and a changing society (pp. 279-295). San Francisco Jossey-Bass.*Ford, D. Y., & Harris, J. J. (1996). Perceptions and attitudes of Black students toward school, achievement, and other educational variables. Child Development, 67, 1141-1152.*Foster, R. (1997). Epistemologic and practical issues in multimethod research A procedure for conceptual triangulation. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(2) 1-12.*Fraser, B. J. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 307-327.*Fraser, B. J. (1998). Classroom environment instruments Development, validity and applications. attainment Environments Research, 1, 7-34.Freiberg, H. J. (1998). Measuring school climate permit me count the ways. Educational Leadership, 56(1), 22-26.*Frieze, I. H. (1976). Causal attributions and information seeking to explain success and failure. Journal of Research in Personalit y, 10, 293-305.Gallay, Les and Suet-ling Pong. (2004). School Climate and Students Intervention Strategies. ships company for Prevention Research Annual Meeting, Quebec City, May 2004.Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers An introduction. White Plains, NY Longman.Graham, S. (1990). On communicating low ability in the classroom Bad things good teachers sometimes do. In S. Graham & V. Folkes (Eds.), Attribution theory Applications to achievement, mental health, and interpersonal conflict (pp. 17-36). Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5-39.*Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1986). From attribution theory to developmental psychology A round-trip ticket? Social Cognition, 4, 152-179.Grant, D. F. (1997, February). Achievement motivation in rural African-American female high school honor graduates Preliminary report. radical presented at the annual multitude of the Eastern Education Research Association. Hilton Head, SC.Graybill, S. W. (1997). Questions of race and culture How they relate to the classroom for the African American students. The Clearing House, 70, 311-319.Griffith, James (2000). School Climate as Group Evaluation and Group Consensus Student and Parent Perceptions of the simple School Environment. The Elementary School Journal 101(1) 35-61.Guild, P. (1994). The culture/learning style connection. Education Leadership, 51(8), 16-21.Hale, J. E. (1980). A matter of culture The educative styles of Afro-American children. Connecticut Elementary and Early Childhood Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No ED197856)Hale, J. E. (1982). Black children Their roots, culture, and learning styles. Baltimore Johns Hopkins University Press.Hale, J. E. (2001). Learning while Black Creating educational excellence for African American children. Baltimore The Johns Hopkins University Press.Hale-Benson, J. (1996). Black children The ir roots, culture and learning styles. Baltimore John Hopkins University Press.Harris, C. A. (1999). The relationship between principal leadership styles and teacher stress in low socioeconomic urban elementary schools as perceived by teachers (Doctoral dissertation, Regent University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 60(6-A).Haynes, N. M., & Comer, J. P. (1990). Helping black children in the context of their culture The significance of some social factors. In K. Lomotey (Ed.), Going to school The African-American experience (pp. 103-112). Albany State University of New York Press.Haynes, N. M., & Comer, J. P. (1993). The Yale School Development curriculum process, outcomes, and policy implications. Urban Education, 28(2), 166-199.Hirase, S. K. (2000). School climate. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(02), p. 439. (Publication Number AAT 9963110)Hopkins, W. (2000). Quantitative research design. Sportscience, vol. 4, no.1.Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (1982). Educational administration Theory, research, and practice.(2nd ed., pp. 185-219). New York Random House.Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1993). Teachers sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. Elementary School Journal, 93, 355-372.Huang, S. L., & Waxman, H. C. (1996, April). Learning environment differences between high- and low-achieving minority students in urban middle schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.Hurd, H. (2001). The Black/White achievement gap in North Carolina. Black Issues in Higher Education, 18(6), 33-49.Irvine, J. J., & Armento, B. J. (2001). Culturally responsive teaching Lesson planning for elementary and middle grades. New York McGraw-Hill.*Jamal, M. (1999). Job stress and employee well-being A cross-cultural empirical study. Stress Medicine, 15, 153-158.Joseph, P. B. (2000). Cultures of curriculum. New Jersey Erlbaum.Karpicke, H., & Murphy, M. E. (1996). Pr oductive school culture Principals working from the inside. NASSP Bulletin, 80(576), 26-32.*Kaufman, J. (2004). The interplay between social and cultural determinants of school effort and success An investigation of Chinese-immigrant and second-generation Chinese students perceptions toward school. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1275-1298.*Keller, J. (1995). Intrinsic/extrinsic motivation in children Detrimental effects of superfluous social controls. Review of Educational Research, 52, 309-339.Kuperminc, G. P., Leadbeater, B. J., Emmons, C., & Blatt, S. J. (1997). Perceived school climate and difficulties in the social adjustment of middle school students. Applied Developmental Science, 1(2), 76-88.Ladson-Billings, G. (1995) The dreamkeepers Successful teachers of African American children. Quarterly Black Review of Books, 4, 30.*Lynn, M., & Hassan, K. (1999). Raising the critical consciousness of African American students in Baldwin Hills A portrait. Journal of total darknes s Education, 68, 42-54.*Ma, X., & Macmillan, R. B. (1999). Influences of workplace conditions on teachers job satisfaction. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 1-12.*MacDonald, D. (1999). Teacher attrition A review of the literature. Teacher and Teacher Education, 15, 835-848.Mahiri, J. (1998). Shooting for excellence African American and youth culture in new century schools. New York National Council of Teachers of English and Teachers College Press.Marshall, Megan L. (2004). Examining School Climate Defining Factors and Educational Influences. Center for Research on School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management. Georgia State University.McClelland, D. (1985). Human motivation. New York Scott, Foresman.Moeller, M. R. (2005). Changes in students perceptions of school climate and responsibility during their high school years. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A Humanities & Social Sciences, 65, 2491.Monrad, Diane M., May, R. J., DiStefano, C., Smith, J. , Gay, J., Mindrila, D., Gareau, S., Rawls, A. (2008). Parent, Student, and Teacher Perceptions of School Climate Investigations Across Organizational Levels. New York.National Center for Education Statistics. (2008). PSS Survey. Accesed April 29, 2008ONeil, R. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Accessed September 8, 2007, at http//www.roboneill.co.uk/ documentPing Xiang & LEE, Amelia. (2002). Achievement goals, perceived motivational climate, and students self-reported mastery behaviors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 58-65.Remy, M. (1999). The relationship of principal leadership styles and school-site conditions to stress levels of elementary school teachers (Doctoral dissertation, University of San Diego, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49.Rinaldo, V. (2005). Todays practitioner is both qualitative and quantitative researcher. The High School Journal, 89(1), 72-79.Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Te achers workplace The social organization of schools. NewYork Longman.*Sander, W. (1997). Catholic high schools and rural academic achievement. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 1-12.*Smerdon, B. A. (2002). Students perceptions of membership and their high schools. Sociology of Education, 23, 275-281.*Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 464-467.Tatum, Alfred W. Engaging African American Males in Reading. Helping Struggling Students, February 2006, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 44-49,Taylor, D. L., & Tashakkori, A. (1995). Decision participation and school climate as predictors of job satisfaction and teachers sense of efficacy. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(3), 217-227.*Tyson, L. (2002). stigma cultural literacy Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411-451.Voelkl, K. E. (1995). School warmth, student participation and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(12), 14-17.Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York Wiley & Sons.*Waxman, H. C., & Huang, S. K. (1997). Classroom instruction and learning environment differences between effective and ineffective urban elementary schools for African American students. Urban Education, 32, 7-44.Weiner, B. (1985). Theories of motivation mechanism to cognition. Chicago McNally.Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York Springer-Verlag.Weiss, E. M. (1999). Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention a secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 861-879.Whaley, A. L., & Smyer, D. A. (1998). Self-evaluation processes of African American youth in a high school completion program. The Journal of Psychology, 132, 317-328.Weiner, B. (1985). Theories of motivation mechanism to cognition. Chicago McNally.Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Re view, 92, 548-573.Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York Springer-Verlag.

No comments:

Post a Comment